Leandro v. State: The Challenges of Litigating School Funding Equity in Hyper-Partisan Times

Authors

Mark Dorosin

Date

2024

Abstract

The Leandro case serves as a critical case study highlighting the limitations of litigation in addressing educational inequities, particularly in states committed to undermining public education. Despite the judiciary's constitutional role as an independent check on legislative actions, the politicization of state supreme courts has transformed them into partisan entities. This shift erodes public trust in the legal process and disproportionately harms marginalized groups, many of whom have historically relied on the courts to safeguard their constitutional rights, including equitable access to public education. The Leandro case underscores the challenges of achieving meaningful educational reform through litigation in a highly politicized environment.

Recommended Citation

Dorosin, Mark (2024) "Leandro v. State: The Challenges of Litigating School Funding Equity in Hyper-Partisan Times," Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity: Vol. 13: Iss. 1, Article 5.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/jrge/vol13/iss1/5