Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2019
Abstract
In Euclid v. Ambler Realty, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of zoning, including zoning that excluded apartment houses and retail businesses. Although the decision was not unanimous, the Euclid minority did not write a formal dissent. The purpose of this article is to show what such a dissent should have looked like.
Recommended Citation
48 Real Est. L.J. 372 (2019)
Source Publication
Real Estate Law Journal
Included in
Housing Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons
Comments
48(3) Real Estate Law Journal (2019), p. 372